CAT 2024 - Slot 3 Varc Question 9
This is a detailed step-by-step solution for CAT 2024 - Slot 3 Varc Question 9. Understand the concept, common mistakes, and expert tips to solve similar questions in CAT exam.
CAT 2024 Slot 3 - VARC
The statement in the question draws a comparison between Moutai’s claimed hangover-proof quality and a groundbreaking historical invention (gunpowder). The use of "would make it" suggests a hypothetical scenario, and the comparison is meant to emphasise significance, not an actual invention. This indicates that the comparison is metaphorical/figurative (Option c), conveying the liquor’s potential impact on culture and society; hence, we can eliminate Option a.
Option b also implies that the comparison is based on actual substance or tangible qualities. Though the claim about being hangover-proof is substantive, the comparison to gunpowder is not grounded in tangible, measurable terms but rather in its significance. Similarly, Option d suggests that the phrase equates Moutai directly with gunpowder, which is incorrect: the phrase does not treat the two as synonyms but draws a symbolic comparison.
Hence, option c is the correct choice.