- Study Anytime, Anywhere through Our Mobile App & Web Portal
- 1000+ Video Lectures by CAT/XAT Topper Faculties
- 400+ Hours content of CAT Preparation Videos
- 9000+ Questions in Online CAT Coaching Course
- 200+ Topic Based Tests (50+ Basic, 50+ Moderate & 50+ Advanced Level)
- 20+ CAT Mocks (Pro CATs – Best Online Tests Series for CAT)
- 10+ Mock OMETs (Online Test Series for SNAP, NMAT, IIFT, XAT, TISS, CMAT)
- Online Doubt Solving on One – to – One basis
- GD-PI-WAT Online Preparation Material
Get access to the detailed solutions to the previous years questions asked in IIM IPMAT exam
The passage provides several arguments in favour of making peer review data public, but it does not mention that making this data public would help in selecting appropriately qualified reviewers for academic writing.
Option a: The passage mentions that openly publishing peer review data could help journals address fraudulent peer reviews, such as authors using fake email addresses to review their own manuscripts. Therefore, this is a reason given in favour of making the data public.
Option b: The passage discusses a study showing that women and non-Westerners are underrepresented among peer reviewers. Publishing peer review data could help highlight these gender and race biases, which is one of the reasons for making the data public.
Option c: The passage suggests that sharing peer-review data could help journals tackle issues like fraud, inefficiency, and systemic bias in the publishing process, which is another reason given in favour of making the data public.
Hence, option d is the correct answer.