How to solve XAT 2016 Question 41?

This question can be solved by applying the core concept explained in the solution above, followed by step-by-step calculation and elimination of options.

Which concept is tested in this question?

This question tests fundamental concepts commonly asked in XAT exams.

All Courses » XAT » XAT 2016 » Question 41 Solution

XAT 2016 Question 41

This is a detailed step-by-step solution for XAT 2016 Question 41. Understand the concept, common mistakes, and expert tips to solve similar questions in XAT exam.

XAT

Proclaiming something without any evidence is futile. Option A is wrong.
Without being sure of the involvement of competitors in any conspiracy, blaming is not correct. Options D are incorrect.
Option B would not help Shekhawat prove that his product is healthy which is the main allegation.
Option C is the best alternative for Shekhawat. He can prove both that his product is healthy and the allegations are false.
Hence, option C is the correct answer.

← Back to Questions Free Resources

Solved by Stalwart Experts

Our team of MBA educators with 10+ years experience provides accurate, verified solutions. Meet the Team

get_footer(); ?>